Labor Toolkit

Key Elements of a Labor Program

SEVERANCE

Statutory Payments

Contractual Benefits

Ex Gratia Severance Payments

Adverse Selection and Targeting

Implementation Issues

Material and Sources

Implementation Issues

Three main implementation issues arise in severance programs: (1) the definition of severance procedures, (2) payment options and procedures, and (3) monitoring and evaluation arrangements. This section covers the first two items; the third item is discussed in module 7.

Severance Procedures

Well-documented redundancy and severance procedures can improve the quality and transparency of severance and can avoid the potential for dispute and opposition during implementation, which in turn may create delays. The advantages of having clearly established procedures are that (a) there is a common understanding on the terms, conditions, and definitions applicable to severance; (b) the prospect of redundancy has been raised and discussed (in some PPI utilities, the culture may still be one of "jobs for life"); and (c) there are clear guidelines for conducting severance activities (such as calculation of amounts owed to each worker or disbursement procedures).

Severance procedures should be set out in a policy statement or in regulations at the government or enterprise level, and usually are agreed to by government and worker representatives before restructuring starts. The CD-ROM accompanying this Toolkit provides an outline of a general redundancy policy and an example of a redundancy policy from a privatized freight railway.

Outline of a redundancy policy.

Redundancy policy for a privatized railway.

In addition to establishing procedures, governments can develop a manual for the entire severance process. The typical content of such a manual is set out in box 5.9.

Severance procedures generally cover the following areas:

Box 5.9: Content of a Severance Manual

What should be included in a severance manual? Circumstances will differ but the procedures could include the following material:

Box 5.10: Regularizing Casual and Stipendiary Workers in the Orissa Power Sector

Public sector enterprises can engage large numbers of workers on ad hoc or occasional terms. In the Orissa State Electricity Board, for example, 5,336 semiskilled workers, engaged for extended periods as daily paid "nominal muster roll" workers, were regularized as part of the preprivatization restructuring of OSEB. Their remuneration then rose from Rs. 30 per day to about Rs, 3,500 per month. Similarly some 250 so-called stipendiary engineers had been employed by OSEB through emergency recruitment procedures, but they lacked any service benefits other than a fixed stipend. Following corporatization of OSEB, most of these engineers were regularized and made permanent employees of the successor company– the Grid Corporation of Orissa.

Although these groups were relatively weak stakeholders, their regularization helped create a strong positive impression regarding the reform process, and helped to back up the stance taken by the government of Orissa that power sector reforms would not lead to compulsory retrenchment. These workers could have been retrenched but, according to one former chairman/ managing director, "possibly with such a beginning we would not have been able to carry on with the reforms" (p. 24).

Source: Ray 2001.

Payment Options and Procedures

There are choices for when and how severance payments are made.

The implementing agency must decide how to pay severance to workers. Early retirement benefits are normally paid from the pension plan. For severance, the main options are to:

Workers' preferences for these different options will vary among countries. Preferences can be determined through well-designed and statistically valid surveys representing all of the work force (all ages, all cadres, and both genders), perhaps as part of the prelayoff worker surveys (described later in this module in the section on redeployment programs). Factors that influence workers' preferences are likely to include:

Accurate and prompt payments of severance are critical. Workers who are paid incorrectly or late are treated unfairly and can create public dissatisfaction with the process. Moreover, in the absence of clear payment procedures there is a risk that severance monies will be captured by fraudulent people or that there is wide disparity in implementation among different units of the enterprise.

Therefore, the job of the manager in the implementing agency is to ensure that the right worker receives the right amount, at the right time, with no surprises. This generally involves the following steps:

back to top

Home

How to Use the Toolkit

Labor Toolkit:
Framework and Overview

Labor Impacts of PPI

Assessing the Scope of Restructuring

Strategies and Options

Key Elements of a Labor Program

Severance

Pensions and PPI

Redeployment Support

Employee Share Ownership

Engaging with Stakeholders

Monitoring and Evaluation

Sitemap

Search   

Download Modules as PDF Documents

References

Glossary

Case Studies

Tools

Additional Materials

Web Sites

Quick Cost Calculator